ALL SEX DATING
clear and disable history
Dating line for people with disabilities in sa
Silvia Yee In many ways, this collection of papers on the burgeoning field of national, regional and international instruments directed towards the redress of disability discrimination is really about the existence of disability prejudice.Most of the papers focus on practical or theoretical issues raised by the laws themselves, or the jurisprudential, social and political choices that shape the drafting and enactment of laws.Nonetheless, every paper is built on the conviction that disability prejudice is a fundamental force behind the exclusion of people with disabilities from a myriad of social and economic opportunities, and one author in particular writes in detail about the personal and systemic consequences of persistent disability prejudice and stereotypes. This paper certainly does not dispute the existence of disability prejudice, but it does seek to take a direct look at disability prejudice to argue that the phenomenon of disability prejudice is not widely understood or truly accepted among the political, legal and social institutions that are counted upon to put anti-discrimination laws into practice.
The first binding regional convention concerning discrimination against people with disabilities finally entered into force last year, and the United Nations (UN) General Assembly has just convened an Ad Hoc Committee to actively investigate and set proposals for a binding international instrument concerning discrimination against people with disabilities. Even international human rights tribunals have shown a corresponding willingness in recent years to interpret general human rights instruments in a way that recognizes the failure to extend human rights to people with disabilities as a clear violation of international law, and not simply an unfortunate consequence of an individual’s impairment.
Both the Organization of American States’ (OAS) Human Rights Commission and the European Court of Human Rights have denounced the prejudicial mistreatment and particularly high potential for the denial of human rights faced by people with disabilities in situations of involuntary confinement.
In the European case, the Court specifically noted that there was “no evidence in this case of any positive intention to humiliate or debase the applicant,” but nonetheless found a violation of the Convention: “to detain a severely disabled person in conditions where she is dangerously cold, risks developing sores because her bed is too hard or unreachable, and is unable to go to the toilet and keep clean without the greatest of difficulty, constitutes degrading treatment contrary to Article 3.” In the face of such escalating activity and official acknowledgment, how can it be asserted that disability prejudice is unheard of?
In fact, I do not believe that disability prejudice is of, at least in modern Western society, and all over the world, nations are paying attention to the reality of discrimination claimed by people with disabilities.
I do, however, believe that the precise inability or unwillingness of many people, including people who have suffered from other kinds of prejudices themselves, to truly grapple with the what and why of disability prejudice lies at the heart of much of the resistance and backlash that disability discrimination legislation and policies have recently faced in the United States. While this paper certainly does not purport to supply final answers to such critical questions as what disability prejudice is, how it operates and is communicated, and how to combat it, I hope to initiate a closer examination of the many assumptions inherent in the way we currently answer these questions.